Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-20
review-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-20-intdir-telechat-wicinski-2025-08-02-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 23)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2025-08-05
Requested 2025-07-28
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Thomas Graf , Benoît Claise , Alex Huang Feng
I-D last updated 2025-10-24 (Latest revision 2025-09-30)
Completed reviews Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -14 by Menachem Dodge (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -14 by Martin Duke (diff)
Genart Early review of -17 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff)
Perfmetrdir IETF Last Call review of -17 by Qin Wu (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -19 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -20 by Tim Wicinski (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Tim Wicinski
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry by Internet Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/zXu4IqSSAUaL2BW3RLmTszlKmLg
Reviewed revision 20 (document currently at 23)
Result Ready
Completed 2025-08-02
review-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-20-intdir-telechat-wicinski-2025-08-02-00
I am the assigned int-dir reviewer for this draft.These comments were written
with the intent of improving the Internet area aspects of the IETF drafts.
Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

I feel this document is well written and clear.  I have one comment for the
authors and one minor nit.

## Comment - The Introduction feels too long

it's over 2 pages long and it essenetially puts the architecture design in the
Introduction, as well as using terminology named in section2.

Suggestion - the first 3 paragraphs as the introduction, and moved the rest
right after Terminology.   Perhaps the WG already decided on this, which it is
not enough to hold things up.

## Nit - terminology

Your define three terms (could you alphabetize them?) but when you use them in
the document you do not alphabetize them. I found several examples, I can
submit details if you wish

thanks
tim