Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-13
review-ietf-opsawg-mud-13-secdir-lc-montville-2017-10-28-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 25)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2017-11-07
Requested 2017-10-24
Authors Eliot Lear , Ralph Droms , Dan Romascanu
I-D last updated 2017-10-28
Completed reviews Secdir Early review of -08 by Adam W. Montville (diff)
Genart Early review of -08 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Iotdir Early review of -08 by Henk Birkholz (diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -08 by Martin Björklund (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -13 by Adrian Farrel (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Adam W. Montville (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -20 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -20 by Scott O. Bradner (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Adam W. Montville
State Completed
Review review-ietf-opsawg-mud-13-secdir-lc-montville-2017-10-28
Reviewed revision 13 (document currently at 25)
Result Ready
Completed 2017-10-28
review-ietf-opsawg-mud-13-secdir-lc-montville-2017-10-28-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
 Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

The draft is ready.

All previously identified potential issues (see [1]) seem to have been
addressed. For the security ADs, please review the summary I wrote at [1],
which is still applicable.

For the opsawg folks, if (when?) you get around to describing how software
packages might be able to convey their intended use and/or preferred
configuration, let me know - I'd like to help.

[1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg07563.html