Telechat Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-13
review-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-13-intdir-telechat-thubert-2024-05-03-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 19)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2024-03-06
Requested 2024-02-29
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Michael Richardson , Wei Pan
I-D last updated 2024-05-03
Completed reviews Dnsdir Last Call review of -12 by Nicolai Leymann (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -12 by Dave Thaler (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -13 by Pascal Thubert (diff)
Secdir Early review of -03 by Christopher A. Wood (diff)
Genart Early review of -02 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Intdir Early review of -02 by David Lamparter (diff)
Iotdir Early review of -02 by Dave Thaler (diff)
Comments 
This document was placed very recently on the IESG evaluation, please try to do some Internet & IoT reviews if possible as I won't be able to do reviews (on PTO...)
Assignment Reviewer Pascal Thubert
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations by Internet Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/aphV9NrjKYH8CL1Eso1wFUwRk3E
Reviewed revision 13 (document currently at 19)
Result Ready
Completed 2024-05-03
review-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-13-intdir-telechat-thubert-2024-05-03-00
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for
draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-13. These comments were written
primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and
shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments
from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last
Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate,
see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>.

Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as NO
OBJECTION.

This document details concerns about how Internet of Things (IoT) devices use
IP addresses and DNS names and provides important recommendations for IoT
manufacturors implementing MUD. I found the document easy to read and useful
for the community.

Nits:

use of ! : please review if all "!" in the document are really intended.

Abstract

   Alos, this document << typo

1.  Introduction

   Conceretely, << typo

4.1.  Use of IP Address Literals in-protocol

...
   The first is that it eliminates problems with firmware updates that
   might be caused by lack of DNS, or incompatibilities with DNS.

   >> written as this it looks positive. In fact I guess the intention is
   something like "mask till it's too late" correct?

6.4.  Do Not Use Tailored Responses to answer DNS Names

   When the MUD controller makes it's << its?

7.  Privacy Considerations

   The more complex case of section Section 4.1 << avoid dup

That's it, only nits. Many thanks to the authors for their work here.