Telechat Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-15
review-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-15-dnsdir-telechat-gieben-2024-07-27-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Telechat Review
Team DNS Directorate (dnsdir)
Deadline 2024-08-06
Requested 2024-07-22
Authors Tirumaleswar Reddy.K , Dan Wing , Blake Anderson
I-D last updated 2025-04-18 (Latest revision 2024-08-23)
Completed reviews Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -13 by R. (Miek) Gieben (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -13 by Qin Wu (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -13 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -10 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Yangdoctors IETF Last Call review of -10 by Xufeng Liu (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -15 by R. (Miek) Gieben (diff)
Assignment Reviewer R. (Miek) Gieben
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls by DNS Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/rxaTfks3KB0pTnZEa7xAjgAFw_8
Reviewed revision 15 (document currently at 18)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2024-07-27
review-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-15-dnsdir-telechat-gieben-2024-07-27-00
Hi,

I'm the designated reviewer for dnsdir, and reviewed version -15 of this draft. 

It looks like my previous message about this draft (-13) still stands:
(At minimum, I think a reference to RFC 7858 should be added, just for completeness with DoH)

Cheers,
Miek

> I've reviewed version 13 of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls for dnsdir and found only
> few things in the 'nits' category.
> 
> 1. DoT (dns over tls) is mentioned but there is no reference to RFC 7858, might
> be good to add a reference (to the Introduction section)? 2. DoT traffic itself
> might be more traceable because it runs on a different port (853) - unsure if
> the authors want/need to say more about this?
> 
> Paragraph 4.2 "Encrypted DNS" looks correct to me.

Regards,
Miek