Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-04
review-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-04-genart-lc-halpern-2024-08-15-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2024-08-26 | |
Requested | 2024-08-12 | |
Requested by | Joe Clarke | |
Authors | Guy Harris , Michael Richardson | |
I-D last updated | 2024-08-15 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -04
by Joel M. Halpern
(diff)
Intdir Last Call review of -05 by Carlos J. Bernardos (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Joel M. Halpern |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/cuLKJjZwBKVbeKclE4YB4E4VMz0 | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 08) | |
Result | Almost ready | |
Completed | 2024-08-15 |
review-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-04-genart-lc-halpern-2024-08-15-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-04 Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review Date: 2024-08-15 IETF LC End Date: None IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This document is almost ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Major issues: While it may be vacuous, it is necessary to include a security considerations section. Minor issues: (Unclear if this is Major or Minor): The table layout for the IANA registry fails to conform to I-D / RFC requirements. Considered as text, it is much too wide. Considered as HTML, the normal rendering blocks important parts of the table. I recommend asking the RPC and IANA how to format the I-D so as to produce a suitable RFC. Nits/editorial comments: N/A