Early Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5706bis-01
review-ietf-opsawg-rfc5706bis-01-perfmetrdir-early-mirsky-2026-01-26-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5706bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 03) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | Performance Metrics Directorate (perfmetrdir) | |
| Deadline | 2026-01-23 | |
| Requested | 2026-01-07 | |
| Requested by | Alvaro Retana | |
| Authors | Benoît Claise , Joe Clarke , Adrian Farrel , Samier Barguil , Carlos Pignataro , Ran Chen | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-03-02 (Latest revision 2026-03-02) | |
| Completed reviews |
Iotdir Early review of -01
by Dave Thaler
(diff)
Dnsdir Early review of -01 by Johan Stenstam (diff) Yangdoctors Early review of -01 by Martin Björklund (diff) Artart Early review of -01 by Harald T. Alvestrand (diff) Genart Early review of -01 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) Tsvart Early review of -01 by Lars Eggert (diff) Secdir Early review of -03 by Jacqueline McCall Perfmetrdir Early review of -01 by Greg Mirsky (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -01 by Dhruv Dhody (diff) Opsdir Early review of -01 by Tina Tsou (Ting ZOU) (diff) |
|
| Comments |
Hi! I'm requesting an early review of this document from all directorates, given the requirement that all future RFCs include an Operational Considerations section (see Section 3 for details). Focus on how the contents of the draft (including the concise checklist of key questions in Appendix A) apply to your specific area of expertise. Thanks! |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Greg Mirsky |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Early review on draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5706bis by Performance Metrics Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/0rNN5D-Sqyz8hxr9fGKkPk9PWxQ | |
| Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 03) | |
| Result | Has issues | |
| Completed | 2026-01-26 |
review-ietf-opsawg-rfc5706bis-01-perfmetrdir-early-mirsky-2026-01-26-00
Dear Authors,
Thank you for your work on this document. I wholeheartedly agree with your view
that adding Operational Considerations to an IETF document will help in the
deployment of the specified mechanism. I found the document well-written and
easy to read. The concern I have is with the assertion of the relationship
between the scopes of Operation and Management, Operation, Administration, and
Maintenance, expressed in the Terminology section as:
The broader concept of "operations and management" that is the
subject of this document encompasses OAM, in addition to other
management and provisioning tools and concepts.
Can you reference a document that discusses that relationship? It seems that
RFC 6291 avoided discussing this issue. In your opinion, what is the value of
that assertion to the document?
Regards,
Greg