Skip to main content

IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-11
review-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-11-yangdoctors-lc-rahman-2025-05-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team YANG Doctors (yangdoctors)
Deadline 2025-05-16
Requested 2025-05-05
Requested by Mahesh Jethanandani
Authors Mohamed Boucadair , Bo Wu
I-D last updated 2025-07-10 (Latest revision 2025-07-07)
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -04 by Reshad Rahman (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -09 by Tina Tsou (diff)
Yangdoctors IETF Last Call review of -05 by Reshad Rahman (diff)
Yangdoctors IETF Last Call review of -11 by Reshad Rahman (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -12 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -11 by Ines Robles (diff)
Comments
Most of the changes in the document relate to the move to enable TLS for TACACS+, and so the SECDIR review.

The last review from a YANG doctor's perspective was done on the -05 version of the document. It should therefore be a quick check to see if any changes need to be reviewed.
Assignment Reviewer Reshad Rahman
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang by YANG Doctors Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/1qyFehD4BV_InDKBQCP0vCXcKW0
Reviewed revision 11 (document currently at 13)
Result Ready
Completed 2025-05-06
review-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-11-yangdoctors-lc-rahman-2025-05-06-00
I have reviewed the changes between -05 (my previous review) and -11. The
document is ready.

I do have 1 question: why were a few "nacm:default-deny-write" statements
removed? I looked in the archive and didn't find any mention of this.

Regards,
Reshad.