IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-11
review-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-11-yangdoctors-lc-rahman-2025-05-06-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
Team | YANG Doctors (yangdoctors) | |
Deadline | 2025-05-16 | |
Requested | 2025-05-05 | |
Requested by | Mahesh Jethanandani | |
Authors | Mohamed Boucadair , Bo Wu | |
I-D last updated | 2025-07-10 (Latest revision 2025-07-07) | |
Completed reviews |
Yangdoctors Early review of -04
by Reshad Rahman
(diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -09 by Tina Tsou (diff) Yangdoctors IETF Last Call review of -05 by Reshad Rahman (diff) Yangdoctors IETF Last Call review of -11 by Reshad Rahman (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -12 by Robert Sparks (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -11 by Ines Robles (diff) |
|
Comments |
Most of the changes in the document relate to the move to enable TLS for TACACS+, and so the SECDIR review. The last review from a YANG doctor's perspective was done on the -05 version of the document. It should therefore be a quick check to see if any changes need to be reviewed. |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Reshad Rahman |
State | Completed | |
Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang by YANG Doctors Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/1qyFehD4BV_InDKBQCP0vCXcKW0 | |
Reviewed revision | 11 (document currently at 13) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2025-05-06 |
review-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-11-yangdoctors-lc-rahman-2025-05-06-00
I have reviewed the changes between -05 (my previous review) and -11. The document is ready. I do have 1 question: why were a few "nacm:default-deny-write" statements removed? I looked in the archive and didn't find any mention of this. Regards, Reshad.