Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-08
review-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-08-secdir-lc-ladd-2024-05-05-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 14)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2024-05-10
Requested 2024-04-26
Authors Mohamed Boucadair , Tirumaleswar Reddy.K
I-D last updated 2025-10-07 (Latest revision 2024-07-22)
Completed reviews Genart IETF Last Call review of -08 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -08 by Watson Ladd (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Tommy Pauly (diff)
Intdir IETF Last Call review of -08 by Dr. Joseph D. Touch (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -10 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Tsvart Early review of -03 by Tommy Pauly (diff)
Intdir Early review of -03 by Dr. Joseph D. Touch (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Watson Ladd
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/MNVmdksHIwDRO3hOgywlPEz3Reo
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 14)
Result Ready
Completed 2024-05-05
review-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-08-secdir-lc-ladd-2024-05-05-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is READY.

This document simply adds more information about a flow to IPFIX,
that information being UDP extensions. It's no surprise that the
securities considerations is appropriately short, and I found no
reason to disagree.

Sincerely,
Watson Ladd