Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-11
review-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-11-genart-telechat-campbell-2013-11-27-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 14) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2013-04-23 | |
| Requested | 2013-04-17 | |
| Authors | Dean Cheng , Mohamed Boucadair , Alvaro Retana | |
| I-D last updated | 2013-11-27 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -07
by Ben Campbell
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -11 by Ben Campbell (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Ben Laurie (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Ben Campbell |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 11 (document currently at 14) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2013-11-27 |
review-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-11-genart-telechat-campbell-2013-11-27-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-11 Reviewer: Ben Campbell Review Date: 2013-04-19 IESG Telechat date: 2013-04-25 Summary: Ready for publication as an informational RFC. All of the comments from my previous review of version 07 have been addressed. However, there Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: Note: The online IDNits tool appears to be broken today, so I was unable to recheck this version. There is a new section 12 added since version 07. If there is another revision prior to approval, I suggest the authors make another pass at proofreading it. If not, the errors are all of the sort that can be reasonably fixed by the RFC editor. Some specifics: -- paragraph 3, 1st sentence: "If one approach is to be deployed, it is the operator's decision for the choice." -- paragraph 4, 1st sentence: "... there requires some configurations."