Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11
review-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11-genart-lc-halpern-2018-01-04-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2018-01-16
Requested 2018-01-02
Authors Shraddha Hegde , Pushpasis Sarkar , Hannes Gredler , Mohan Nanduri , Luay Jalil
I-D last updated 2018-01-04
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -09 by Martin Vigoureux (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -11 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -11 by Sean Turner (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -13 by Tim Chown (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -12 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Joel M. Halpern
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 11 (document currently at 16)
Result Ready
Completed 2018-01-04
review-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11-genart-lc-halpern-2018-01-04-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2018-01-04
IETF LC End Date: 2018-01-16
IESG Telechat date: 2018-01-25

Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard

Major issues:
    N/A; my concerns from earlier versions have been addressed.

Minor issues:
    I understand the WG likes using the term "overload" for a link being taken
    out of service.  I think people will learn what we mean.  I do wish we had
    not chosen to misuse the words in this fashion.  This is much more a
    graceful-link-close indication (or clsoe-pending indication) than it is an
    overload indication.

Nits/editorial comments: