Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11
review-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11-genart-lc-halpern-2018-01-04-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 16) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2018-01-16 | |
Requested | 2018-01-02 | |
Authors | Shraddha Hegde , Pushpasis Sarkar , Hannes Gredler , Mohan Nanduri , Luay Jalil | |
I-D last updated | 2018-01-04 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -09
by Martin Vigoureux
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -11 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) Genart Telechat review of -10 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -11 by Sean Turner (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -13 by Tim Chown (diff) Genart Telechat review of -12 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Joel M. Halpern |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 11 (document currently at 16) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2018-01-04 |
review-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11-genart-lc-halpern-2018-01-04-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11 Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review Date: 2018-01-04 IETF LC End Date: 2018-01-16 IESG Telechat date: 2018-01-25 Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard Major issues: N/A; my concerns from earlier versions have been addressed. Minor issues: I understand the WG likes using the term "overload" for a link being taken out of service. I think people will learn what we mean. I do wish we had not chosen to misuse the words in this fashion. This is much more a graceful-link-close indication (or clsoe-pending indication) than it is an overload indication. Nits/editorial comments: