Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-03

Request Review of draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2018-07-04
Requested 2018-06-19
Requested by Acee Lindem
Authors Peter Psenak, Ketan Talaulikar, Wim Henderickx, Padma Pillay-Esnault
Draft last updated 2018-06-29
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -03 by Loa Andersson (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Sheng Jiang (diff)
Very short and straight-forward draft.
Assignment Reviewer Loa Andersson 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-03-rtgdir-lc-andersson-2018-06-29
Reviewed rev. 03 (document currently at 09)
Review result Has Nits
Review completed: 2018-06-29





RtgDir Early review: draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-03.txt


I have been selected to do a routing directorate “early” review of this 

The routing directorate will, on request from the working group chair, 
perform an “early” review of a draft before it is submitted for 
publication to the IESG. The early review can be performed at any time 
during the draft’s lifetime as a working group document. The purpose of 
the early review depends on the stage that the document has reached.

As this document is close to working group last call, my focus for the 
review was to determine whether the document is ready to be published. 
Please consider my comments along with the other working group last call 

For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see 

Document: draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-03.txt
Reviewer: Loa Andersson
Review Date: 2018-06-29
Intended Status: Standards track


No issues found.

This document is basically ready for publication, but has nits that 
should be considered prior to being submitted to the IESG.

I have gathered the nits in a word file that has been sent to the
authors and chairs. I also recommend that the authors take a look at
my proposed change to the IANA section.


The nits found is that the Abstract is too raw, but as sufficient info
are available in the Introduction, this should be a simple editorial

There is one sentence at the end of section that I think is ambigious.
But I leave it to the authors to update if they think it is necessary.

LSA is actually not a well-know abbreviation, and should be expanded.
However, I think it should be well-know, since this is within the
purview of the LSR chairs, I leave to them to take necessary actions
if they see fit.

I have suggested some editorial changes to the IANA considerations.


Loa Andersson                        email:
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64