Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-20
review-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-20-opsdir-lc-ersue-2018-01-08-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 23)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2018-01-11
Requested 2017-12-19
Authors Acee Lindem , Abhay Roy , Dirk Goethals , Veerendranatha Reddy Vallem , Fred Baker
Draft last updated 2018-01-08
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -14 by IJsbrand Wijnands (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -20 by Mehmet Ersue (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -20 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Mehmet Ersue
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-20-opsdir-lc-ersue-2018-01-08
Reviewed revision 20 (document currently at 23)
Result Ready
Completed 2018-01-08
review-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-20-opsdir-lc-ersue-2018-01-08-00
I reviewed the document "OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility"
(draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-20.txt) as part of the Operational
directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by
the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
operational area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.

Intended status: Standards Track
Current IESG state: In Last Call (ends 2018-01-11)
IANA State: IANA - Review Needed
Updates RFC 5340 (OSPF for IPv6) and RFC 5838 (Support of Address Families in
OSPFv3)

Summary:
The document extends the Link State Advertisement (LSA) format by encoding the
existing OSPFv3 LSA information in Type-Length-Value (TLV) tuples and allowing
advertisement of additional information with additional TLVs.  The document
provides backward compatibility mechanisms.

There are no relevant nits in the document.

I believe the document does not cause any issues related to operations and
management. It has a clear language and looks ready for publication.

Mehmet