Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-20
review-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-20-opsdir-lc-ersue-2018-01-08-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 21)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2018-01-11
Requested 2017-12-19
Other Reviews Rtgdir Early review of -14 by IJsbrand Wijnands (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -20 by Joel Halpern (diff)
Review State Completed
Reviewer Mehmet Ersue
Review review-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-20-opsdir-lc-ersue-2018-01-08
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/5tHFFG6wSnBL4o3VytGkvRBxPSc
Reviewed rev. 20 (document currently at 21)
Review result Ready
Draft last updated 2018-01-08
Review completed: 2018-01-08

Review
review-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-20-opsdir-lc-ersue-2018-01-08

I reviewed the document "OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility" (draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-20.txt) as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the operational area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

Intended status: Standards Track
Current IESG state: In Last Call (ends 2018-01-11) 
IANA State: IANA - Review Needed 
Updates RFC 5340 (OSPF for IPv6) and RFC 5838 (Support of Address Families in OSPFv3)

Summary: 
The document extends the Link State Advertisement (LSA) format by encoding the existing OSPFv3 LSA information in Type-Length-Value (TLV) tuples and allowing advertisement of additional information with additional TLVs.  The document provides backward compatibility mechanisms.

There are no relevant nits in the document.

I believe the document does not cause any issues related to operations and management.
It has a clear language and looks ready for publication.

Mehmet