Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-14
review-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-14-genart-telechat-dunbar-2020-06-09-01

Request Review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2020-06-09
Requested 2020-06-04
Authors Peter Psenak , Les Ginsberg , Wim Henderickx , Jeff Tantsura , John Drake
Draft last updated 2020-06-10
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -07 by Daniele Ceccarelli (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -12 by Daniele Ceccarelli (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -12 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -12 by Michael Scharf (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Scott O. Bradner (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -14 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -14 by Scott O. Bradner (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Linda Dunbar
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-14-genart-telechat-dunbar-2020-06-09
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/S6bj88Kwnn2Hv5LbVJUTxeDPeEE
Reviewed revision 14 (document currently at 16)
Result Ready
Completed 2020-06-10
review-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-14-genart-telechat-dunbar-2020-06-09-01
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-14
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review Date: 2020-06-10
IETF LC End Date: 2020-05-29
IESG Telechat date: 2020-06-11

Summary:
This document proposes a new OSPF  Link attribute to indicate the intended
purpose of the advertised TE information. So that if the RSVP-TE is not enabled
on a link, the TE attributes of the Link being advertised can't be used by
remote receiving nodes for  RSVP-TE purpose.

I have reviewed this draft multiple times, provided comments to -11, -12
version. The authors have addressed many of them in the -14 version.  Many
thanks.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

Best Regards,
Linda Dunbar