Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-14
review-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-14-opsdir-telechat-bradner-2020-06-14-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Telechat Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2020-06-09
Requested 2020-06-04
Authors Peter Psenak , Les Ginsberg , Wim Henderickx , Jeff Tantsura , John Drake
Draft last updated 2020-06-14
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -07 by Daniele Ceccarelli (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -12 by Daniele Ceccarelli (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -12 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -12 by Michael Scharf (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Scott O. Bradner (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -14 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -14 by Scott O. Bradner (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Scott O. Bradner
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-14-opsdir-telechat-bradner-2020-06-14
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/ZWf3YhslYQaxHUmC4DVu8bpRXEA
Reviewed revision 14 (document currently at 16)
Result Ready
Completed 2020-06-14
review-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-14-opsdir-telechat-bradner-2020-06-14-00
I have reviewed the latest version of this document and my earlier issues have
been resolved at least well enough for teh document to be considered ready for
publication.

that said I still do not see where "User Defined Application Identifier" is
actually cleanly defined - one can read carefully and determine but it would be
easier on the reader to just say that it is a field that can be used to
indicate the use of one or more non-standard applications within some scope
(network, subnet, link, organization, ... not sure what scopes are meaningful
here but it does not seem that a User Defined Application Identifier would be a
global (between network operators) value

Scott