Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ttz-05
review-ietf-ospf-ttz-05-genart-lc-levin-2017-01-05-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ttz
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-12-30
Requested 2016-12-16
Other Reviews Rtgdir Early review of -03 by Christian Hopps (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -06 by Linda Dunbar
Review State Completed
Reviewer Orit Levin
Review review-ietf-ospf-ttz-05-genart-lc-levin-2017-01-05
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/OCrIhZ9t7B6bigmH4EC0i7EEzc4
Reviewed rev. 05 (document currently at 06)
Review result Ready with Nits
Draft last updated 2017-01-05
Review completed: 2017-01-05

Review
review-ietf-ospf-ttz-05-genart-lc-levin-2017-01-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.



For more information, please see the FAQ at



<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.



Document: draft-ietf-ospf-ttz-05

Reviewer: Orit Levin

Review Date: 2017-01-03

IETF LC End Date: 2017-01-03

IESG Telechat date: (if known)



Summary:

This draft is well-written and well organized. It is basically ready for publication, but has a couple of nits that should be fixed before publication.



Section 5.1 Paragraph 2 sets requirements for uniqueness of TTZ ID and of TTZ instance. The scope of the ID and the algorithm for ensuring its uniqueness needs to be specified.

Also, the text about "TTZ instances" is somewhat confusing. Consider replacing it with "A TTZ MUST NOT have more than one instance in a network."



Section 5.2 Paragraph 2 contains a typo. Replace "need configure" to "need to configure".



Section 14 first table needs clarification. Consider replacing "9 Suggested" to "Value '9' is suggested" and stating the reason for not choosing the next available value.



Thanks,

Orit.