Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-06
review-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-06-rtgdir-lc-niven-jenkins-2019-07-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2019-07-12
Requested 2019-06-27
Requested by Martin Vigoureux
Authors Anton Smirnov , Alvaro Retana , Michael Barnes
I-D last updated 2019-07-09
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -02 by Ben Niven-Jenkins (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -06 by Ben Niven-Jenkins (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Roni Even (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Kathleen Moriarty
Opsdir Telechat review of -06 by Tim Chown (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Ben Niven-Jenkins
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/2m5jV8FiHVRBPYkCLA9w0NOci6g
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready
Completed 2019-07-09
review-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-06-rtgdir-lc-niven-jenkins-2019-07-09-00
 Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs.
For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see
​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would
be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call
comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by
updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-06.txt
Reviewer: Ben Niven-Jenkins
Review Date: 9th July 2019
IETF LC End Date: 11th July 2019
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary: No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

Comments: The document is readable and succinctly addresses the use case
outlined.

Major issues: No major issues found.

Minor issues: No minor issues found.

Regards
Ben