Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-07
review-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-07-secdir-lc-moriarty-2019-08-21-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2019-07-11 | |
| Requested | 2019-06-27 | |
| Authors | Anton Smirnov , Alvaro Retana , Michael Barnes | |
| Draft last updated | 2019-08-21 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -02
by
Ben Niven-Jenkins
(diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -06 by Ben Niven-Jenkins (diff) Genart Last Call review of -06 by Roni Even (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Kathleen Moriarty Opsdir Telechat review of -06 by Tim Chown (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Kathleen Moriarty |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-07-secdir-lc-moriarty-2019-08-21
|
|
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/QRs7rf-1AtLy4v6odUoZrdXKIvs | |
| Reviewed revision | 07 | |
| Result | Has Nits | |
| Completed | 2019-08-21 |
review-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-07-secdir-lc-moriarty-2019-08-21-00
I apologize for the very late review. I see you are already working on Roman's discuss, so perhaps this nit could be addressed still. In the security considerations section, the following text is included: As such, no new security threats are introduced beyond the considerations in OSPFv2 [RFC2328], OSPFv3 [RFC5340], and [RFC5786]. However, new considerations follow and as such, the above statement isn't entirely accurate. I do agree that no security is provided in these protocols, and that is not new, but new information is exposed. Perhaps saying additional considerations follow would be better than saying "no new security threats are introduced". Thank you, Kathleen