Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-07
review-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-07-secdir-lc-moriarty-2019-08-21-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2019-07-11
Requested 2019-06-27
Authors Anton Smirnov , Alvaro Retana , Michael Barnes
Draft last updated 2019-08-21
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -02 by Ben Niven-Jenkins (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -06 by Ben Niven-Jenkins (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Roni Even (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Kathleen Moriarty
Opsdir Telechat review of -06 by Tim Chown (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Kathleen Moriarty
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-07-secdir-lc-moriarty-2019-08-21
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/QRs7rf-1AtLy4v6odUoZrdXKIvs
Reviewed revision 07
Result Has Nits
Completed 2019-08-21
review-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-07-secdir-lc-moriarty-2019-08-21-00
I apologize for the very late review.  I see you are already working on Roman's
discuss, so perhaps this nit could be addressed still.

In the security considerations section, the following text is included:

   As such, no new
   security threats are introduced beyond the considerations in OSPFv2
   [RFC2328], OSPFv3 [RFC5340], and [RFC5786].

However, new considerations follow and as such, the above statement isn't
entirely accurate.  I do agree that no security is provided in these protocols,
and that is not new, but new information is exposed.  Perhaps saying additional
considerations follow would be better than saying "no new security threats are
introduced".

Thank you,
Kathleen