Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pals-congcons-01
review-ietf-pals-congcons-01-genart-lc-bonica-2015-12-21-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-pals-congcons |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 02) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2016-01-05 | |
| Requested | 2015-12-03 | |
| Authors | Yaakov (J) Stein , David L. Black , Bob Briscoe | |
| Draft last updated | 2015-12-21 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -01
by
Ron Bonica
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Hilarie Orman (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -01 by Menachem Dodge (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -01 by Keyur Patel (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Ron Bonica |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-pals-congcons-01-genart-lc-bonica-2015-12-21
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 02) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2015-12-21 |
review-ietf-pals-congcons-01-genart-lc-bonica-2015-12-21-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> Document: draft-ietf-pals-congcons-01 Reviewer: Ron Bonica Review Date: 2015-12-15 IETF LC End Date: 2015-12-15 IETF Telechat Date: TBD Summary: This document is ready for publication In summary, draft-ietf-congcons-01: - applies only to pseudowires that run over something other than MPLS (e.g., GRE) - concludes that no additional mechanisms are needed for elastic pseudowires - concludes that an inelastic pseudowire MAY shutdown when it experiences higher-than-acceptable loss, latency or jitter - observes that that for TDM PWs, as loss rate increases, higher-than-acceptable loss generally occurs before the fixed-rate TDM PW could cause serious problems for competing congestion-responsive traffic - Therefore, no additional mechanisms are needed for inelastic pseudowires, either I see nothing objectionable in the draft. However, its scope is extremely limited and it conclusions are not earthshattering. Nonetheless, the work is sound and deserves publication. Major Issues: None Minor Issues: None Editorial Issues: Ron Bonica