Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04
review-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04-secdir-lc-lonvick-2016-12-01-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2016-12-06 | |
| Requested | 2016-11-24 | |
| Authors | Yimin Shen , Rahul Aggarwal , Wim Henderickx , Yuanlong Jiang | |
| I-D last updated | 2016-12-01 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -04
by Dale R. Worley
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Susan Hares (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -00 by Mach Chen (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -00 by John Drake (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -04 by David L. Black (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Chris M. Lonvick |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 05) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2016-12-01 |
review-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04-secdir-lc-lonvick-2016-12-01-00
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. I'm not familiar with this technology but the specification appears to address the security concerns. I like that the relevant RFCs for the base and associated protocols are each listed in the Security Considerations section. The document appears well written and I found no nits in my albeit brief review. Best regards, Chris