Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04
review-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04-secdir-lc-lonvick-2016-12-01-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2016-12-06
Requested 2016-11-24
Authors Yimin Shen , Rahul Aggarwal , Wim Henderickx , Yuanlong Jiang
Draft last updated 2016-12-01
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -04 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Susan Hares (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -00 by Mach Chen (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -00 by John Drake (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -04 by David L. Black (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Chris M. Lonvick
State Completed
Review review-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04-secdir-lc-lonvick-2016-12-01
Reviewed revision 04 (document currently at 05)
Result Ready
Completed 2016-12-01
review-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04-secdir-lc-lonvick-2016-12-01-00
Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. 
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security 
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these 
comments just like any other last call comments.

I'm not familiar with this technology but the specification appears to 
address the security concerns. I like that the relevant RFCs for the 
base and associated protocols are each listed in the Security 
Considerations section.

The document appears well written and I found no nits in my albeit brief 
review.

Best regards,
Chris