Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pals-rfc4447bis-05
review-ietf-pals-rfc4447bis-05-genart-lc-droms-2016-09-28-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-pals-rfc4447bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2016-09-21 | |
Requested | 2016-08-23 | |
Authors | Luca Martini , Giles Heron | |
I-D last updated | 2016-09-28 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -05
by Ralph Droms
Rtgdir Early review of -03 by Adrian Farrel (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Ralph Droms |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-pals-rfc4447bis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 05 | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2016-09-28 |
review-ietf-pals-rfc4447bis-05-genart-lc-droms-2016-09-28-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Each review must include a summary statement chosen from or adapted from the following list: This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC. I have only two small editorial comments: Figure 2 appears to be missing a couple of backslashes in the ASCII art drawing. The sentence "This document has been written to address errata in a previous version of this standard.” probably ought to be moved to section 2. A broader statement in the Abstract to the effect that this document is a rewrite of RFC 4447 for publication as an Internet Standard might be more helpful. - Ralph