Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv-02

Request Review of draft-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-04-05
Requested 2016-03-24
Authors Vengada Govindan, Carlos Pignataro
Draft last updated 2016-04-01
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -02 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Phillip Hallam-Baker (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Francis Dupont
State Completed
Review review-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv-02-genart-lc-dupont-2016-04-01
Reviewed rev. 02 (document currently at 03)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2016-04-01


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv-02.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20160331
IETF LC End Date: 20160405
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
 - in ToC page 2 and 2.1 page 4: capabilites -> Capabilities

 - in ToC page 2 and 6 page 9: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments

 - 2.2.2 page 5 (twice): signalling -> signaling

 - in 2.3 page 6: I am not sure (*) the "encased" term is common English
  (*) but I am not a native English speaker too... I suggest to ask
  someone from Asia for instance. Or simply leave this to the RFC Editor?


Francis.Dupont at

PS: already sent to id.all at