Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv-02
review-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv-02-genart-lc-dupont-2016-04-01-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 03) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2016-04-05 | |
Requested | 2016-03-24 | |
Authors | Vengada Prasad Govindan , Carlos Pignataro | |
I-D last updated | 2016-04-01 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -02
by Francis Dupont
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Phillip Hallam-Baker (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Francis Dupont |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 02 (document currently at 03) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2016-04-01 |
review-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv-02-genart-lc-dupont-2016-04-01-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv-02.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20160331 IETF LC End Date: 20160405 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: - in ToC page 2 and 2.1 page 4: capabilites -> Capabilities - in ToC page 2 and 6 page 9: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments - 2.2.2 page 5 (twice): signalling -> signaling - in 2.3 page 6: I am not sure (*) the "encased" term is common English (*) but I am not a native English speaker too... I suggest to ask someone from Asia for instance. Or simply leave this to the RFC Editor? Regards Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr PS: already sent to id.all at ietf.org