Last Call Review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-aptx-04
review-ietf-payload-rtp-aptx-04-secdir-lc-kivinen-2013-12-12-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-payload-rtp-aptx |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2013-12-06 | |
Requested | 2013-11-28 | |
Authors | John Lindsay, Hartmut Foerster | |
I-D last updated | 2013-12-12 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -04
by Wassim Haddad
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Tero Kivinen (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Tero Kivinen |
State | Completed Snapshot | |
Review |
review-ietf-payload-rtp-aptx-04-secdir-lc-kivinen-2013-12-12
|
|
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 05) | |
Result | Has Nits | |
Completed | 2013-12-12 |
review-ietf-payload-rtp-aptx-04-secdir-lc-kivinen-2013-12-12-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document describes how to transmit proprietary audio codec algorithms standard apt-X and enchanced apt-X in the RTP. The document has security considerations section which seems to be OK. If I have understood correctly the codec is constant bit rate codec, thus it is not vulnerable to the traffic analysis attacks described for example in the draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-vbr-audio document. Perhaps the security considerations section could note that these codecs are not vulnerable to those attacks (if that is in deed true). -- kivinen at iki.fi