Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-opus-08

Request Review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-opus
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2015-04-07
Requested 2015-04-02
Authors Julian Spittka , Koen Vos , Jean-Marc Valin
I-D last updated 2015-04-13
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -07 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Derek Atkins (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Christer Holmberg
State Completed
Review review-ietf-payload-rtp-opus-08-genart-telechat-holmberg-2015-04-13
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 11)
Result Ready with Nits
Completed 2015-04-13

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <>

Document:                         draft-ietf-payload-rtp-opus-08

Reviewer:                           Christer Holmberg

Review Date:                     11 April 2015

IETF LC End Date:             17 February 2015

IETF Telechat Date:         9 April 2015

Summary:        Most of the comments I gave on a previous version of the
document have been addressed. However, it seems like one of the comments have
not been addressed.

Major Issues: None

Minor Issues: I previously gave the following comment:

“Regarding SDP, I think it would be good to have the ABNF syntax for the a=fmtp
parameter (currently you only have descriptive text of the different
parameters). It makes the life for the parser implementers
 much easier :)”

I guess one, by reading section 7 and the examples, can figure out how to
encode the a=fmtp parameter, but I think it would to explicitly define the

Editorial nits: None