Last Call Review of draft-ietf-payload-vp9-13
review-ietf-payload-vp9-13-secdir-lc-shekh-yusef-2021-05-12-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-payload-vp9 |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 16) | |
Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2021-05-21 | |
Requested | 2021-05-07 | |
Authors | Justin Uberti , Stefan Holmer , Magnus Flodman , Danny Hong , Jonathan Lennox | |
I-D last updated | 2025-03-27 (Latest revision 2021-06-10) | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -13
by Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
(diff)
|
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Rifaat Shekh-Yusef |
State | Completed | |
Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-payload-vp9 by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/S8oZJknSJOtBV6nMui5I_WWT0UA | |
Reviewed revision | 13 (document currently at 16) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2021-05-12 |
review-ietf-payload-vp9-13-secdir-lc-shekh-yusef-2021-05-12-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The document describes an RTP payload format for the VP9 video codec. The security consideration section lists a number of RTP documents that deal with the RTP protocol and its security. The section also highlights that the application is the one that is responsible for securing the media. The security consideration section also discusses the potential impact of a corrupted RTP payload on the receiver and indicates that this is unlikely to pose a denial of service threat. This seems reasonable to me.