Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-10
review-ietf-pce-association-bidir-10-secdir-lc-lonvick-2021-01-19-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 14)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2021-01-29
Requested 2021-01-15
Authors Rakesh Gandhi , Colby Barth , Bin Wen
Draft last updated 2021-01-19
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -09 by Harish Sitaraman (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -09 by Harish Sitaraman (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Al Morton (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Chris M. Lonvick
State Completed
Review review-ietf-pce-association-bidir-10-secdir-lc-lonvick-2021-01-19
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/a8m3D2sMF12ud79s7MNeQmGYQe8
Reviewed revision 10 (document currently at 14)
Result Ready
Completed 2021-01-19
review-ietf-pce-association-bidir-10-secdir-lc-lonvick-2021-01-19-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
 Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready.

The Security Considerations section is a bit light, but addresses the matter.
The only nit I found was that in the Security Considerations section, the use
of TLS for securing the PCEP session is "recommended". I think that's a BCP 14
keyword so should be "RECOMMENDED". (I don't think that's significant enough to
change the summary to Has Nits.)

Best regards,
Chris