Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-10
review-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-10-rtgdir-lc-niven-jenkins-2021-08-31-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 16) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
Deadline | 2021-09-01 | |
Requested | 2021-08-10 | |
Requested by | John Scudder | |
Authors | Siva Sivabalan , Clarence Filsfils , Jeff Tantsura , Stefano Previdi , Cheng Li | |
I-D last updated | 2021-08-31 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -10
by Ben Niven-Jenkins
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -11 by Reese Enghardt (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Dan Harkins (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Ben Niven-Jenkins |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/Ge8lYDNuo-_dv1I0BWkgW_yeMWo | |
Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 16) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2021-08-31 |
review-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-10-rtgdir-lc-niven-jenkins-2021-08-31-00
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-10 Reviewer: Ben Niven-Jenkins Review Date: 31st August 2021 Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: No issues found. This document is ready for publication. Comments: The document clearly outlines the use case and protocol details. Major issues: No major issues found. Minor issues: No minor issues found. Ben