Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07
review-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07-secdir-lc-farrell-2019-05-29-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2019-05-30 | |
| Requested | 2019-05-16 | |
| Authors | Daniel King , Haomian Zheng | |
| I-D last updated | 2019-12-18 (Latest revision 2019-07-08) | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -07
by Mach Chen
(diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Stephen Farrell (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Stephen Farrell |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/quVGSvnDSqtRBZTERbnYk8XxTZ4 | |
| Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 08) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2019-05-29 |
review-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07-secdir-lc-farrell-2019-05-29-00
I'm not sure if this is a nit or not: The draft describes uses of PCE involving multiple domains. But the "domain" concept in this case seems to encompass both/either different administrative domains and/or different technology domains within a single administrative boundary. If it's realistic, wouldn't it be good give recommendations as to what to do at least when administrative boundaries are being crossed? (E.g. "use TLS" in that case.) Other than that the draft appears ready to me.