IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pce-multipath-25
review-ietf-pce-multipath-25-genart-lc-bryant-2026-06-04-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-pce-multipath
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 29)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2026-06-03
Requested 2026-05-20
Authors Mike Koldychev , Samuel Sidor
I-D last updated 2026-08-24 (Latest revision 2026-06-23)
Completed reviews Opsdir Early review of -19 by Italo Busi (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -18 by Cheng Li (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -25 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -25 by David Mandelberg (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -27 by Vidhi Goel (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stewart Bryant
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-pce-multipath by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/8ljmPCymEsD4vnfmsCaF8ZwdpJk
Reviewed revision 25 (document currently at 29)
Result Ready
Completed 2026-06-04
review-ietf-pce-multipath-25-genart-lc-bryant-2026-06-04-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-pce-multipath-25
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2026-06-04
IETF LC End Date: 2026-06-03
IESG Telechat date: 2026-06-18

Summary:A well written document ready for publication

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

I-D Nits picked up:   "-- The document has examples using IPv4 documentation
addresses according to RFC6890, but does not use any IPv6 documentation
addresses.  Maybe there should be IPv6 examples, too?"

I am not sure there is a lot of IPv6 in these deployments but none the less
authors should probably start citing IPv6 examples,