Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-04
review-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-04-opsdir-lc-bradner-2018-01-01-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2017-12-28 | |
| Requested | 2017-12-14 | |
| Authors | Dhruv Dhody , Daniel King , Adrian Farrel | |
| I-D last updated | 2018-01-01 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -04
by Ben Niven-Jenkins
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Scott O. Bradner (diff) Genart Last Call review of -04 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -04 by Taylor Yu (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Scott O. Bradner |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 05) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2018-01-01 |
review-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-04-opsdir-lc-bradner-2018-01-01-00
This is an OPS-DIR review of Experimental Codepoint Allocation for the Path Computation Element communication Protocol (PCEP) (draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-04) This ID asks the IANA to assign experiential codepoints in 3 PCE registries. As such, the ID inherently presents no operational issues. It is certainly the case that such an experimental codepoint could be used in a way that could present significant operational issues but that is no reason not to adopt this ID. The ID is clearly written and, in my opinion, is ready for adoption. Scott