Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pce-questions-06
review-ietf-pce-questions-06-opsdir-lc-ersue-2014-07-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-pce-questions
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2014-07-08
Requested 2014-06-24
Authors Adrian Farrel , Daniel King
I-D last updated 2014-07-09
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -06 by Alexey Melnikov (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Ben Laurie (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Mehmet Ersue (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Mehmet Ersue
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-pce-questions by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready
Completed 2014-07-09
review-ietf-pce-questions-06-opsdir-lc-ersue-2014-07-09-00

I have reviewed the document "Unanswered Questions in the Path Computation
Element Architecture" (draft-ietf-pce-questions-06.txt) as part of the
Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being
processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit
of the operational area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.



Intended status: Informational

Current draft status: Submitted to IESG for Publication



Summary: The document discusses unanswered questions from available PCE
architectural views with respect to the interactions between architectural
components and in an architectural context with reference to other
architectural components, existing protocols, and recent IETF work efforts. The
document further suggests how the architectural components might be combined to
provide advanced PCE function.



I think the document is well-written. No specific management aspects have been
discussed. I don't see any issues from the operations and management pov.



No draft nits found.



Mehmet