Early Review of draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-13
review-ietf-pce-sid-algo-13-rtgdir-early-white-2024-08-23-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 14) | |
Type | Early Review | |
Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
Deadline | 2024-08-23 | |
Requested | 2024-07-25 | |
Requested by | Dhruv Dhody | |
Authors | Samuel Sidor , Alex Tokar , Shaofu Peng , Shuping Peng , Andrew Stone | |
I-D last updated | 2024-08-23 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -13
by Russ White
(diff)
Opsdir Early review of -13 by Nagendra Kumar Nainar (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Russ White |
State | Completed | |
Request | Early review on draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/0aGd5eSiHJrHpP_ABihBap0gBNM | |
Reviewed revision | 13 (document currently at 14) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2024-08-23 |
review-ietf-pce-sid-algo-13-rtgdir-early-white-2024-08-23-00
Hello I have been selected to do a routing directorate “early” review of this draft. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo/ The routing directorate will, on request from the working group chair, perform an “early” review of a draft before it is submitted for publication to the IESG. The early review can be performed at any time during the draft’s lifetime as a working group document. The purpose of the early review depends on the stage that the document has reached. As this document has recently been adopted by the working group, my focus for the review is on providing a new perspective on the work, with the intention of catching any issues early on in the document's life cycle. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/rtg/RtgDir Document: draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-13 Reviewer: Russ White Review Date: 23 August 2024 Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: No issues found. This documents is ready to proceed to the IESG. Comments: This document clearly justifies this new work, and has enough of a use case to help the reader understand why it is being developed/created. The extension seems useful. The document is well-written and appears to be easy to implement.