Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-10
review-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-10-secdir-lc-franke-2019-08-28-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2019-08-28
Requested 2019-08-14
Draft last updated 2019-08-28
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -09 by Jonathan Hardwick (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Daniel Franke (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Erik Kline (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -10 by David Black (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Joe Clarke (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -11 by David Black
Assignment Reviewer Daniel Franke
State Completed
Review review-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-10-secdir-lc-franke-2019-08-28
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/6i5DkY_hFxjXAjVfv_Y7DRIclwU
Reviewed rev. 10 (document currently at 11)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2019-08-28

Review
review-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-10-secdir-lc-franke-2019-08-28

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's  ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the  security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

The protocol that this draft extends is one intended to be run over TLS and conducted between two endpoints controlled by the same administrative authority. The Security Considerations section duly makes this explicit and references another RFC which thoroughly discusses what can occur when these assumptions are violated. When the protocol is run as intended, there is no communication across trust boundaries and therefore the potential security concerns are minimal.