Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-11
review-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-11-tsvart-telechat-black-2019-09-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 12)
Type Telechat Review
Team Transport Area Review Team (tsvart)
Deadline 2019-09-17
Requested 2019-08-30
Authors Dhruv Dhody , Rakesh Gandhi , Udayasree Palle , Ravi Singh , Luyuan Fang
I-D last updated 2019-09-09
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -09 by Jonathan Hardwick (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Daniel Fox Franke (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Erik Kline (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -10 by David L. Black (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Joe Clarke (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -11 by David L. Black (diff)
Assignment Reviewer David L. Black
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth by Transport Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/CIBMr6TN-gj5VbZnBZduAyOV3tc
Reviewed revision 11 (document currently at 12)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2019-09-09
review-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-11-tsvart-telechat-black-2019-09-09-00
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
discussion list for information.

When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.

The -11 version of this draft contains a new paragraph of text in Section 6.6
that warns operators about the timing interaction possibility with transport
protocols raised in the review of the -10 version.  That paragraph also
provides an implicit suggestion on what to do (just use the 5 minute default
time period between samples).

Nit in that new paragraph: "(5 minute)" -> "(5 minutes)"
This nit can be left to the RFC Editor to correct.