Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-12
review-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-12-secdir-lc-eastlake-2019-03-22-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2019-03-20
Requested 2019-03-06
Authors Udayasree Palle , Dhruv Dhody , Yosuke Tanaka , Vishnu Pavan Beeram
I-D last updated 2019-03-22
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -10 by Andrew G. Malis (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -12 by David Schinazi (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -13 by Tim Chown
Assignment Reviewer Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 12 (document currently at 13)
Result Ready
Completed 2019-03-22
review-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-12-secdir-lc-eastlake-2019-03-22-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready.

Although the Security Considerations section is fairly short, it has
references to a number of relevant earlier RFCs that have quite
extensive Security Considerations sections. Furthermore PCEP was
previous extended to cover P2MP Traffic Engineered Label Switched
Paths and separately extended to be stateful. This draft's addition of
support for stateful P2MP TE LSPs is not that big of a change in
Security Considerations from those in the earlier RFCs.

Editorial

Section 3.2, Page 5, "are same as" -> "are the same as"

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com