Telechat Review of draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-15
review-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-15-genart-telechat-sparks-2014-11-21-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 15) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2014-11-23 | |
Requested | 2014-10-30 | |
Authors | Young Lee , Greg M. Bernstein , Jonas MÃ¥rtensson , Tomonori Takeda , Takehiro Tsuritani , Oscar Gonzalez de Dios | |
I-D last updated | 2014-11-21 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -14
by Robert Sparks
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -14 by Robert Sparks (diff) Genart Telechat review of -15 by Robert Sparks Secdir Last Call review of -14 by Dan Harkins (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Robert Sparks |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 15 | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2014-11-21 |
review-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-15-genart-telechat-sparks-2014-11-21-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-15 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 21-Nov-2014 IETF LC End Date: IESG Telechat date: 25-Nov-2014 Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC Nits/editorial comments: This revision addresses my comments from IETF-LC on revision 14 (copied below). Thanks! RjS On 10/17/14 11:33 AM, Robert Sparks wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-14 > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review Date: 17-Oct-2014 > IETF LC End Date: 27-Oct-2014 > IESG Telechat date: not currently scheduled for any telechat > > Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC but with nits > that should be considered before publication > > Nits/editorial comments: > > There are 6 authors listed - please double-check the guidance in > section 4.1.1 of RFC7322. > If retaining all the authors still makes sense, please help Adrian by > providing an argument > that he can pass to the RFC Editor. > > The shepherd writeup indicates a solution ID is ready. I didn't check > to see how the requirements > listed here were reflected there. Would it make sense to provide a > reference? (While I see no harm > in publishing the document, it's not clear how doing so will be > helpful if the requirements were > uncontentious as the writeup implies. There are few enough of them > that adding a short list in > the mechanism document might be more effective.) > > Items 2 and 3 in section 3.4 are confusing as currently written. 2 > seems to be talking > about the case that the current path is still optimal. Is 3 trying to > talk about the case > where there is no path, not even the current path, that will work? If > so the "(i.e., other > than the current path)" in 3 doesn't make sense. > > Should you have captured a requirement that any mechanism implementing > these > requirements be extensible to allow for cases like polarization based > multiplexing > when they eventually come along? > > Please consider reordering the sentences in section 3.5 - the last > sentence seems > to be talking about the first paragraph? > > You say "mechanisms defined in this document" several times in section > 4, but this > document defines no mechanisms. > >