Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pcn-signaling-requirements-
review-ietf-pcn-signaling-requirements-genart-lc-dupont-2012-01-15-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-pcn-signaling-requirements
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2012-01-13
Requested 2011-12-30
Authors Georgios Karagiannis , Tom Taylor , Kwok Ho Chan , Michael Menth , Philip Eardley
I-D last updated 2012-01-15
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -?? by Francis Dupont
Assignment Reviewer Francis Dupont
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-pcn-signaling-requirements by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Completed 2012-01-15
review-ietf-pcn-signaling-requirements-genart-lc-dupont-2012-01-15-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on 
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-pcn-signaling-requirements-07.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20120106
IETF LC End Date: 20120113
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
 - in the whole document: behaviour -> behavior and signalling -> signaling
  (note the spelling of collocated is dubious too)

 - Abstract page 1: in the latter case -> in the first case

 - Abstract page 1: the usage is to not refer to RFC in the Abstract

 - ToC page 2: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments

 - 2 page 3: measures- -> measures (in general the document is at
 the limit of abuse of '-' character, here it is clearly a typo)

 - 6 page 6: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments

 - 6 page 6: I don't like the term 'generated', IMHO you can easily
  find a better/nicer term.

 - 7.2 page 7: C. Le Faucher, -> C., Le Faucheur,
                                   ^          ^

Regards

Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr