Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-13
review-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-13-rtgdir-lc-shah-2020-06-19-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 20)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2020-06-19
Requested 2020-05-30
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Authors Hongji Zhao , Xufeng Liu , Yisong Liu , Mahesh Sivakumar , Anish Peter
I-D last updated 2020-06-19
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -05 by Reshad Rahman (diff)
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -12 by Reshad Rahman (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -13 by Himanshu C. Shah (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Stephen Farrell (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -12 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff)
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -19 by Reshad Rahman (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Himanshu C. Shah
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/rxiK6G9nE1g5-qUZ2wXXf6XVgXc
Reviewed revision 13 (document currently at 20)
Result Ready
Completed 2020-06-19
review-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-13-rtgdir-lc-shah-2020-06-19-00
Summary: 

No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

Comments:

This document is very well written. It is precise, clear and easy to understand the intent.
Following comments for clarification (at least for me)

 
|           |  +--ro num-pim-hello?              yang:counter64

Do IGMP switches count PIM hello?

Major Issues:
No major issues found.
Minor Issues:

No minor issues found.