Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pim-mofrr-tilfa-05
review-ietf-pim-mofrr-tilfa-05-rtgdir-lc-hares-2024-09-16-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-pim-mofrr-tilfa |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
| Deadline | 2024-09-23 | |
| Requested | 2024-09-09 | |
| Requested by | Gunter Van de Velde | |
| Authors | Yisong Liu , Mike McBride , Zheng Zhang , Jingrong Xie , Changwang Lin | |
| I-D last updated | 2024-09-16 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -05
by Meral Shirazipour
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Valery Smyslov (diff) Rtgdir Last Call review of -05 by Susan Hares (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Jürgen Schönwälder (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Susan Hares |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-pim-mofrr-tilfa by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/QUUy0fegCawowsXLwWyMvIJQycQ | |
| Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 07) | |
| Result | Has issues | |
| Completed | 2024-09-16 |
review-ietf-pim-mofrr-tilfa-05-rtgdir-lc-hares-2024-09-16-00
This is a Routing Directorate Review. It should be treated as any other WG LC. Summary: This is an informational draft suggesting an TI-LFA for MoFRR. Section 1 states that this document considers: a) PIM over Native IP 2) MDT SAFI multicast VPN [RFC6037] and [RFC6514] - covering PIM-SSM, PIM-SM Tree, and BIDR TREe. My concern is this draft does not consider the Segment List work in inter-domain cases for P2MP situations. The text references Segment IDs and Segment lists and tunnels without giving enough detail to determine if the proposals in the draft-ietf-idr-sr-p2mp-policy might solve the case in a clear way. I am filing this immediate report to ask the authors and AD charge what the exact scope of this document. Are you looking at IGP's only? If so, what are the restrictions on SIDs? If you are looking at Tunnels that use BGP Tunnel Encapsulation to pass SIDs and candidate routes, what is the link here. I will re-review if I can determine the context. I apologize, but the basic interaction with SIDs are unclear.