Telechat Review of draft-ietf-pim-port-
review-ietf-pim-port-genart-telechat-krishnan-2011-11-01-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-pim-port
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2011-11-01
Requested 2011-11-01
Other Reviews Tsvdir Last Call review of - by Gorry Fairhurst (diff)
Review State Completed
Reviewer Suresh Krishnan
Review review-ietf-pim-port-genart-telechat-krishnan-2011-11-01
Posted at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg06881.html
Draft last updated 2011-11-01
Review completed: 2011-11-01

Review
review-ietf-pim-port-genart-telechat-krishnan-2011-11-01

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see


http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html

).

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-pim-port-09.txt
Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
Review Date: 2011/11/01
IESG Telechat date: 2011/11/03

Summary: This document is almost ready for publication as an
Experimental RFC but I have a few comments.

Minor
=====

Section 3.1

* From my reading of the document, it is not clear whether we can have a
node advertise multiple capability options of the same transport
protocol (say PIM-over-TCP-Capable) in the same message. e.g. A dual
stack node might want to advertise its capability to do both IPv4 and
IPv6. Is this possible? If so, how?

Section 4.7

* Section 4 talks about the router with the lower connection ID
initiating the transport layer connection but this does not really map
into the rules mentioned in Section 4.7. Specifically, I am not sure
Rule 3 for Node A in Section 4.7 conveys the same intent as section 4.

Thanks
Suresh