Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-10
review-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-10-secdir-lc-lonvick-2015-10-15-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 12) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2015-10-13 | |
| Requested | 2015-10-01 | |
| Authors | Rui António dos Santos Cruz , Mario Sera Nunes , Jinwei Xia , Rachel Huang , Joao P. Taveira , Deng Lingli | |
| I-D last updated | 2016-05-31 (Latest revision 2015-12-30) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -10
by Vijay K. Gurbani
(diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -10 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -10 by Nevil Brownlee (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Chris M. Lonvick |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 12) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2015-10-15 |
review-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-10-secdir-lc-lonvick-2015-10-15-00
Hi,
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.
Due to a busy time in my life, I've only been able to skim through
this. However, the specification is well laid out and seems to be
fairly thorough. The Security Considerations section appears to be
appropriate as well.
Best regards,
Chris