Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ppsp-survey-08
review-ietf-ppsp-survey-08-genart-lc-housley-2014-11-28-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ppsp-survey
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-06-30
Requested 2014-06-16
Authors Gu Yingjie, Ning Zong, Yunfei Zhang, Francesca Piccolo, Shihui Duan
Draft last updated 2014-11-28
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -08 by Russ Housley (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Radia Perlman (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Scott Bradner (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Russ Housley
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ppsp-survey-08-genart-lc-housley-2014-11-28
Reviewed rev. 08 (document currently at 09)
Review result Almost Ready
Review completed: 2014-11-28

Review
review-ietf-ppsp-survey-08-genart-lc-housley-2014-11-28

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-ppsp-survey-08
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review Date: 2014-06-20
IETF LC End Date: 2014-06-30
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary:  Almost Ready

Major Concerns:  None

Minor Concerns:

- Section 4.5 talks about differences between Tribler and BitTorrent;
  however, BitTorrent has not been described.  The authors need to
  describe BitTorrent before this section, or this section needs to be
  written without comparison to BitTorrent.  At a minimum, a reference
  to a description of BitTorrent is needed here.

- Section 4.6: Please include references for CDN and STUN.

- Section 7: I cannot figure out the sentence that is trying to justify
  the selection of ECC over RSA.  The sentence needs to be rewritten to
  be comprehensible.

- Section 7: Please include a reference for ISO/IEC 9798-3.

Other Comments:

- Section 1 (near bottom of page 3): This is awkward: "... which join
  dynamically the system ..."  I suggest: "... which join the system
  dynamically ..."

- Section 1 (near the top of page 4): I encourage you to avoid the use
  of "regulates".  I suggest:

  - the "tracker protocol" for interaction between trackers and peers;
  - the "peer protocol" for interaction between peers.

  The use of "regulates" appears elsewhere too, and in each case it
  caused to to ask what the authors are really trying to say.  In my
  opinion, the reader will be served by rewording in every one of these
  sentences.

- Section 4.1: s/living streaming content/live streaming content/

- Figure 2: s/Peer3/Peer 3/

- Section 4.2: This is awkward: "PPLive website reached 50 millions of
  visitors for the opening ceremony of Beijing 2008 Olympics, ..."  I
  suggest: "The PPLive website served 50 million visitors during the
  Beijing 2008 Olympics opening ceremony, ..."
  
- Section 4.2: s/PPLIVE/PPLive/

- Section 4.3: s/As it can be seen also in Figure 4, there/
                /Figure 4 also shows that there/