Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ppsp-survey-08
review-ietf-ppsp-survey-08-secdir-lc-perlman-2014-07-10-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ppsp-survey
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2014-06-30
Requested 2014-07-03
Authors Gu Yingjie , Ning Zong , Yunfei Zhang , Francesca Lo Piccolo , Shihui Duan
I-D last updated 2014-07-10
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -08 by Russ Housley (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Radia Perlman (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Scott O. Bradner (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Radia Perlman
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-ppsp-survey by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready
Completed 2014-07-10
review-ietf-ppsp-survey-08-secdir-lc-perlman-2014-07-10-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.



This document minimally documents and functionally compares eight different
deployed peer-to-peer streaming applications targeting video distribution. The
security considerations section describes how the various protocols are secured
and compares the security guarantees.



I applaud the publication of such documents, since it allows someone new to the
field to quickly get a feel for how the protocols compare and it includes in
references where to get detailed information about each one.



I think it is even very useful for people who are not new to the field, since
it is easy to miss the broader conceptual comparison of various protocols when
getting lost in the weeds of the bits and bytes details. It is also great to
see comparisons. It would be good if there were more such “survey documents”
available in different areas. The document is well written and – assuming it is
accurate (I have no way of knowing) makes a real contribution to this space.



Radia