Last Call Review of draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-07
review-ietf-precis-7564bis-07-genart-lc-holmberg-2017-06-22-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-precis-7564bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2017-06-13 | |
Requested | 2017-05-30 | |
Authors | Peter Saint-Andre , Marc Blanchet | |
I-D last updated | 2017-06-22 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -07
by Christer Holmberg
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Rick Casarez (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Matthew A. Miller (diff) Genart Telechat review of -08 by Christer Holmberg (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Christer Holmberg |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-precis-7564bis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 10) | |
Result | Ready w/issues | |
Completed | 2017-06-22 |
review-ietf-precis-7564bis-07-genart-lc-holmberg-2017-06-22-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> Document: draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-07.txt Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date: 22 June 2017 IETF LC End Date: 13 June 2017 IETF Telechat Date: 6 July 2017 Summary: The document is well written, and almost ready for publication. However, I have one comment (see below) that I would like the authors to address. Major Issues: None Minor Issues: Q1: Section 13.2 says that PRECIS only support Unicode. While Unicode is mentioned throughout that document, is that restriction mentioned elsewhere? I think it would be good to make it explicit already in the Introduction, or by indicating it in an Applicability/Scope section in the beginning of the document. Editorial Issues: None