Last Call Review of draft-ietf-precis-7700bis-07
review-ietf-precis-7700bis-07-genart-lc-housley-2017-05-31-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-precis-7700bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2017-06-13 | |
| Requested | 2017-05-30 | |
| Authors | Peter Saint-Andre | |
| Draft last updated | 2017-05-31 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Russ Housley
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Nevil Brownlee (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Daniel Migault (diff) Genart Telechat review of -08 by Russ Housley (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Russ Housley |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-precis-7700bis-07-genart-lc-housley-2017-05-31 | |
| Reviewed rev. | 07 (document currently at 10) | |
| Review result | Ready | |
| Review completed: | 2017-05-31 |
Review
review-ietf-precis-7700bis-07-genart-lc-housley-2017-05-31
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-precis-7700bis-07 Reviewer: Russ Housley Review Date: 2017-05-31 IETF LC End Date: 2017-06-13 IESG Telechat date: 2017-07-06 Summary: Ready Major Concerns: None Minor Concerns: None Nits: Section 2.3 includes this note: Note: An entity SHOULD NOT apply the Case Mapping Rule during enforcement, because typically it is appropriate only during comparison. I question the inclusion of "typically" in this note. Can you simply say that the Case Mapping Rule SHOULD only be used during comparison?