Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-precis-7700bis-07

Request Review of draft-ietf-precis-7700bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2017-06-13
Requested 2017-05-30
Authors Peter Saint-Andre
Draft last updated 2017-06-09
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -07 by Russ Housley (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Nevil Brownlee (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Daniel Migault (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Russ Housley (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Daniel Migault
State Completed
Review review-ietf-precis-7700bis-07-secdir-lc-migault-2017-06-09
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 10)
Result Ready
Completed 2017-06-09

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is READY



2.1.  Rules

   The following rules apply within the Nickname profile of the PRECIS

I might be helpful to add the reference to RFC7564 after the FreeformClass
as you did in section 2.2. Another way could also to assume in the
introduction the reader is familiar with RFC7564. I also agree RFC7564 is
mentioned in the terminology section.


 4.  Normalization Rule: Apply Unicode Normalization Form KC.  Because

Two unexpected white spaces. Can be fixed by rfc-editor


6.  Security Considerations

6.3.  Visually Similar Characters

Maybe a reference to the example section with the names 5/7 or 6/7 can
illustrate that the current profile does not prevent visually similar