Last Call Review of draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15
review-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15-genart-lc-sparks-2015-04-21-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2015-04-28
Requested 2015-04-16
Draft last updated 2015-04-21
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -15 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Derek Atkins (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Robert Sparks
State Completed
Review review-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15-genart-lc-sparks-2015-04-21
Reviewed rev. 15 (document currently at 18)
Review result Ready with Nits
Review completed: 2015-04-21

Review
review-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15-genart-lc-sparks-2015-04-21

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 21Apr2015
IETF LC End Date: 28Apr2015
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled

Summary: Ready for publication as Proposed Standard with one minor nit

This is a very easy to read document for such a detail-rich protocol.

Nit:

The introduction calls out email addresses as an example of the kinds of 
strings these methods are not intended for use in preparing (along with 
LDAP distinguished names). But in the body of the document, email 
addresses (or strings that look just like them) are discussed as valid 
examples of usernames.