Last Call Review of draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15
review-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15-genart-lc-sparks-2015-04-21-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 18) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2015-04-28 | |
Requested | 2015-04-16 | |
Authors | Peter Saint-Andre , Alexey Melnikov | |
I-D last updated | 2015-04-21 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -15
by Robert Sparks
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Derek Atkins (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Robert Sparks |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 15 (document currently at 18) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2015-04-21 |
review-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15-genart-lc-sparks-2015-04-21-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 21Apr2015 IETF LC End Date: 28Apr2015 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled Summary: Ready for publication as Proposed Standard with one minor nit This is a very easy to read document for such a detail-rich protocol. Nit: The introduction calls out email addresses as an example of the kinds of strings these methods are not intended for use in preparing (along with LDAP distinguished names). But in the body of the document, email addresses (or strings that look just like them) are discussed as valid examples of usernames.