Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mspw-er-05
review-ietf-pwe3-mspw-er-05-genart-lc-shirazipour-2014-08-22-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mspw-er
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-08-22
Requested 2014-08-11
Authors Pranjal Dutta , Matthew Bocci , Luca Martini
I-D last updated 2014-08-22
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -05 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Paul E. Hoffman (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Meral Shirazipour
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-pwe3-mspw-er by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 06)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2014-08-22
review-ietf-pwe3-mspw-er-05-genart-lc-shirazipour-2014-08-22-00

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.



Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
receive.



Document: draft-ietf-pwe3-mspw-er-05

Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour

Review Date: 2014-08-22

IETF LC End Date:   2014-08-22

IESG Telechat date: NA





Summary:

This draft is ready to be published as Standard RFC but I have some comments.



Nits/editorial comments:

-[Page 6], Section 4.1, typo: "A noted in Section 1"---->"As noted in Section 1"

-[Page 6],"but each node MUST attempt to determine a loop-free path", if the
only method to detect a loop is http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6073#section-7.6,
then perhaps a reference to this RFC would be useful.

-[Page 8], Section 5, typo :"consesus"---->"consensus"





Best Regards,

Meral

---

Meral Shirazipour

Ericsson

Research

www.ericsson.com