Telechat Review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mspw-er-05
review-ietf-pwe3-mspw-er-05-genart-telechat-shirazipour-2014-08-29-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-pwe3-mspw-er |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2014-09-02 | |
Requested | 2014-08-28 | |
Authors | Pranjal Dutta , Matthew Bocci , Luca Martini | |
I-D last updated | 2014-08-29 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -05
by Meral Shirazipour
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Paul E. Hoffman (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Meral Shirazipour |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-pwe3-mspw-er by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 06) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2014-08-29 |
review-ietf-pwe3-mspw-er-05-genart-telechat-shirazipour-2014-08-29-00
Hi, Thank you. Best Regards, Meral From: Bocci, Matthew (Matthew) [mailto:matthew.bocci at alcatel-lucent.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 3:04 AM To: Meral Shirazipour; draft-ietf-pwe3-mspw-er.all at tools.ietf.org; gen-art at ietf.org Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last review Call draft-ietf-pwe3-mspw-er-05 Meral, Thank you for your review. I agree with all your suggestions and will fix them in an updated version of the draft. Bets regards Matthew On 22/08/2014 16:33, "Meral Shirazipour" < meral.shirazipour at ericsson.com > wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-pwe3-mspw-er-05 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2014-08-22 IETF LC End Date: 2014-08-22 IESG Telechat date: NA Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standard RFC but I have some comments. Nits/editorial comments: -[Page 6], Section 4.1, typo: "A noted in Section 1"---->"As noted in Section 1" -[Page 6],"but each node MUST attempt to determine a loop-free path", if the only method to detect a loop is http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6073#section-7.6 , then perhaps a reference to this RFC would be useful. -[Page 8], Section 5, typo :"consesus"---->"consensus" Best Regards, Meral --- Meral Shirazipour Ericsson Research www.ericsson.com