Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pwe3-p2mp-pw-requirements-07
review-ietf-pwe3-p2mp-pw-requirements-07-genart-lc-carpenter-2014-03-18-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-pwe3-p2mp-pw-requirements
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-03-27
Requested 2014-03-13
Authors Frederic JOUNAY , Yuji Kamite , Giles Heron , Matthew Bocci
I-D last updated 2014-03-18
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -07 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -09 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Tobias Gondrom (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Brian E. Carpenter
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-pwe3-p2mp-pw-requirements by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 10)
Result Ready
Completed 2014-03-18
review-ietf-pwe3-p2mp-pw-requirements-07-genart-lc-carpenter-2014-03-18-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-pwe3-p2mp-pw-requirements-07.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2014-03-18
IETF LC End Date: 2014-03-27
IESG Telechat date:

Summary: Ready
--------

Minor issues:
-------------

The document is scoped for MPLS substrates, but I see very little in it that requires
MPLS. Archtecturally, it is quite general. Was there any consideration of making it
applicable to a non-MPLS substrate?

> 3.4.7.  Scalability
>
>   The solution SHOULD scale at least linearly with the number of Leaf
>   PEs.

I think this should be "at worst linearly".