Telechat Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-33
review-ietf-quic-transport-33-genart-telechat-bryant-2021-01-04-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-quic-transport |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 34) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2021-01-05 | |
Requested | 2020-12-14 | |
Authors | Jana Iyengar , Martin Thomson | |
I-D last updated | 2021-01-04 | |
Completed reviews |
Opsdir Last Call review of -32
by Ron Bonica
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -32 by Stewart Bryant (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -33 by Bernie Volz (diff) Genart Telechat review of -33 by Stewart Bryant (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Stewart Bryant |
State | Completed | |
Review |
review-ietf-quic-transport-33-genart-telechat-bryant-2021-01-04
|
|
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/kIZBTGpYJCStzG4cSBuSN-KbSrM | |
Reviewed revision | 33 (document currently at 34) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2021-01-04 |
review-ietf-quic-transport-33-genart-telechat-bryant-2021-01-04-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-quic-transport-33 Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review Date: 2021-01-04 IETF LC End Date: 2020-11-16 IESG Telechat date: 2021-01-07 Summary: This is a very clever, well written and innovative body of work, and is ready to be published. Given the huge number of people that will need to be conversant with this, I think it would be useful if a document akin to a tutorial were published by the WG to help those with less specialist interest better understand the principles of operation. Normally such material would be included in the base text, but I understand the concern that this already a large document. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: None